How Does Anaesthesia Work? Reversible Unconsciousness on Demand
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Surgery was limited for most of history by what a conscious person could endure. General anaesthesia removed that limit by producing a controlled, reversible absence of consciousness and of memory, and the remarkable fact is that it was used routinely for well over a century before anyone had a decent account of how it does it.
The four things it has to achieve
General anaesthesia is not a single effect but a combination of separate goals, which is why modern practice uses several drugs rather than one:
- •Unconsciousness, meaning the absence of awareness of the environment
- •Amnesia, meaning no memory formed of the period, which is a distinct property since a patient can be responsive and still form no memory
- •Analgesia, meaning the blocking of pain signals, usually provided by opioids rather than by the anaesthetic itself
- •Immobility, meaning the suppression of movement in response to surgical stimulation, achieved partly by the anaesthetic acting on the spinal cord and partly by separate muscle relaxants
- •Suppression of the autonomic stress response, keeping heart rate and blood pressure from surging
- •Balanced anaesthesia is the term for combining agents so that each is used at a lower and safer dose than achieving everything with one drug would require
How the drugs act
Most general anaesthetics enhance inhibitory signalling in the brain or suppress excitatory signalling, and the majority of intravenous agents act on receptors for the neurotransmitter that normally quietens neural activity, making that inhibition stronger and more prolonged. Others block excitatory receptors instead, producing a rather different state that includes dissociation rather than straightforward sleep. The inhaled agents, which are small volatile molecules, are less easy to explain, and an old theory held that they worked by dissolving into cell membranes in proportion to their fat solubility, which fitted a striking correlation between potency and oil solubility across otherwise unrelated compounds. That theory has largely given way to the view that they act on specific protein targets, including several ion channels, though the correlation that motivated the older idea remains intriguing. What has become clearer is the systems-level account: consciousness appears to depend on integrated communication between brain regions, particularly involving thalamic and cortical networks, and anaesthetics appear to break that integration while leaving local activity intact, so the brain is still working but the parts are no longer talking to each other in the way awareness requires.
How depth is monitored
Judging how deeply someone is anaesthetised is not straightforward, because the patient cannot report and muscle relaxants remove the most obvious sign, which is movement. Anaesthetists rely on a combination of drug dosing calculations, the measured concentration of inhaled agent in exhaled breath, and physiological signs including blood pressure, heart rate, pupil size and tearing. Processed electroencephalogram monitors, which reduce brain electrical activity to an index number, are used in many places and reduce the incidence of awareness in higher-risk cases, while remaining imperfect and behaving differently with different drug classes. Accidental awareness during general anaesthesia is rare, with large audits putting it at roughly one in nineteen thousand cases overall and considerably higher in specific situations including caesarean section under general anaesthesia and cardiac surgery, and it matters enormously because the experience of being aware and paralysed can cause lasting psychological harm. The risk is concentrated at particular moments, principally during induction and at the transition when relaxants are given before the anaesthetic has taken full effect.
The history and the remaining questions
The public demonstration of ether at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1846 is the conventional starting point, followed rapidly by chloroform, and the change in surgical practice was immediate and enormous. Priority disputes were bitter, several of the people involved came to unhappy ends, and earlier uses by others had gone unpublicised. Nitrous oxide had been known for decades and used recreationally before anyone systematically applied it to surgery. The modern era brought agents that are far safer, shorter acting and more controllable, and anaesthetic mortality attributable to the anaesthetic itself has fallen to a very low rate in healthy patients. Open questions remain substantial. The mechanism of consciousness itself is unresolved, so a complete account of how it is switched off is not available, and anaesthesia is consequently used as a research tool for studying consciousness. Postoperative cognitive effects in older patients, and questions about developmental effects of repeated anaesthesia in very young children, are areas of active and unsettled investigation.
The takeaway
The state is a combination of unconsciousness, amnesia, pain blocking and immobility, achieved with several drugs so each can be used at a lower dose. Most agents strengthen inhibitory signalling or block excitatory signalling, and they appear to break the communication between brain regions that awareness depends on while local activity continues. Depth cannot be directly measured, and accidental awareness runs at roughly one case in nineteen thousand.