Why Paint the Whole Thing in One Colour? To Prove You Did Not Need the Others
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
A painting executed entirely in shades of a single colour removes the easiest way of separating one thing from another, which is exactly why painters took it on.
What the approach is
The painting is made using tones of one colour only, from its lightest to its darkest, with no second hue introduced. Everything that would normally be distinguished by colour must therefore be distinguished by value alone, meaning by how light or dark it is. The result is not a monochrome photograph, since the painter chooses the colour and it carries its own character, and the same composition painted in tones of brown, blue or green produces three quite different objects.
Why painters use it
The restriction is chosen for specific reasons:
- •It forces command of tonal structure with no help from colour
- •It imitates sculpture, particularly relief carving in stone
- •It suits decorative schemes that must not compete with a main work
- •It was cheaper, needing fewer expensive pigments
- •It reads clearly at a distance and in poor light
- •It removes colour disagreements from a design entirely
The sculptural illusion
The most common historical use was to imitate carving, and the illusion depends entirely on controlling tone. Church and palace decoration frequently included painted panels in greys imitating stone relief, placed alongside real carving or in positions where carving would have been impractical, and the best examples are genuinely difficult to distinguish from the real thing at a distance. The technique demands that the painter think about a single light source and about how a raised surface catches it, which is a different discipline from painting a flat scene and was regarded as a test of skill.
The colours that were chosen
Which single colour a painter picked was not arbitrary and each carries associations that survive into modern use. Grey imitates stone most convincingly and was the standard choice for painted relief. Brown, particularly earth pigments, suits flesh and warm interiors and was used for preparatory work because those pigments were cheap and dried reliably. Green underpainting beneath flesh tones was a medieval practice that shows through in many surviving panels where the upper layers have worn thin. Blue suggests distance and night. Red is rare because its darkest tones muddy quickly and its lightest ones read as pink rather than as light.
Where else the restriction appears
The idea of working in one colour recurs well beyond painted stone effects. Ceramic decoration in blue on white is the same principle applied to a different surface and produced some of the most widely traded objects in history. Printmaking works in tone alone by necessity and developed an elaborate vocabulary of hatching to compensate. Photography spent its first century in the same condition and photographers still choose it deliberately. And painters use a single colour underneath a full colour painting to settle the tonal structure before any hue is introduced, which is the same discipline used as a preparatory stage.
The takeaway
Working in tones of a single colour forces everything to be separated by lightness alone, with no help from hue, which is why it was treated as a test of skill. Its commonest historical use was imitating stone relief in decorative schemes, where controlling one light source is the whole illusion. Blue and white ceramics, printmaking and photography face the same restriction.