What Is Renaissance Art? Perspective, Anatomy and the Return of the Ancients
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Something changed in Italian painting between about 1400 and 1520 that is visible without any training: figures acquired weight, rooms acquired depth, faces acquired individuality, and the flat gold ground of medieval altarpieces gave way to landscapes receding to a horizon. The change was not only technical. It came with a new idea about what a painter was, a rediscovery of the classical past, a system of patronage with money behind it, and a set of methods, geometric and anatomical, that turned picture-making into something closer to a science.
Where and when
The word means rebirth, and it was coined by people at the time who believed they were recovering an ancient civilisation after a long interruption, a self-description historians have argued with ever since, since the Middle Ages were neither as dark nor as forgetful as the label implies. The centre was Florence, a republic of about fifty thousand people made rich by wool and banking, and the usual starting point is a competition in 1401 for the bronze doors of its baptistery. From there it spread to Rome, where the papacy became the largest patron in Europe, and to Venice, whose painters cared more for colour and light than for line, and it ran until roughly the sack of Rome in 1527, by which time the style was already being pulled apart by the generation that followed.
What actually changed
Several separate developments arrived close together and reinforced each other:
- •A geometric method for representing depth, demonstrated by Brunelleschi around 1420 and written up by Alberti in 1435, which gave painters a repeatable procedure rather than an intuition
- •The study of anatomy, including dissection, which let figures be built from an understood skeleton and musculature rather than from copied patterns
- •Oil paint, developed in the Netherlands and adopted in Italy, which dries slowly and allows blending, glazing and a depth of colour that egg tempera cannot reach
- •Classical subject matter and forms, as ancient sculpture and literature were recovered, so that pagan myth appeared alongside Christian subjects and columns and pediments returned to architecture
- •Observation from life, with drawing from a posed model becoming the foundation of training
- •A changed status for the artist, from anonymous craftsman under guild contract to a named figure whose individual manner was the thing being bought
Who paid
None of it happened without patrons, and the art reflects what they wanted. The Church remained the largest commissioner, and altarpieces, chapel cycles and tombs are the bulk of the output, but the period's novelty is the private patron: the Medici bank and the families who imitated it, the guilds competing to decorate their own buildings, and the courts of Milan, Mantua, Urbino and Ferrara, where an artist could be retained as a member of the household. Contracts survive in quantity and are wonderfully unromantic, specifying the quantity of gold and of ultramarine, made from imported lapis lazuli and more expensive than gold, the number of figures, the delivery date and the penalty for lateness, and often how much of the work the master had to do with his own hand rather than leaving to the workshop.
North of the Alps
A parallel transformation happened in Flanders and it was not derived from Italy. Jan van Eyck and Rogier van der Weyden were painting with extraordinary optical precision in the 1430s, working in oil with a mastery the Italians did not yet have, and rendering textiles, metal, glass and skin with a fidelity that astonished visitors. Their space is constructed by observation rather than by geometry, their symbolism is dense and domestic, and their portraits set the pattern for the next two centuries. The two traditions met through trade, since Flemish panels were bought by Italian bankers working in Bruges, and the meeting is clearest in Albrecht Durer, who crossed the Alps twice, brought Italian proportion and perspective back to Nuremberg, and used printmaking to distribute his work across Europe in a way no panel painter could.
The high point and the reaction
The two decades either side of 1500 produced the work that fixed the period's reputation, with Leonardo, Michelangelo and Raphael active in the same cities within a few years of each other, and with the largest commissions in Europe, the Sistine ceiling and the rebuilding of Saint Peter's, running at once. The balance did not hold. The generation that followed inherited a solved problem and responded by breaking it deliberately, elongating figures, crowding compositions, using acid colour and unstable poses, in the manner that was later named Mannerism. Vasari, who wrote the biographies in 1550 that shaped every subsequent account, told the story as a steady ascent to Michelangelo and a decline after, a narrative that is still the default and that flattens a great deal. What survived everywhere is the training: drawing from the model, constructed space and the study of anatomy remained the basis of European art education for four hundred years.
The takeaway
The period from about 1400 to 1520, centred on Florence and then Rome and Venice, combined a geometric method for depth, the study of anatomy, oil paint, recovered classical models and drawing from life, and it raised the artist from craftsman to named individual. It ran on patronage from the Church, the banking families and the small courts, whose contracts specified pigments and deadlines. A separate and equally radical tradition developed in Flanders through optical observation rather than geometry, and the two met in Durer.