How Does a Balcony Stay Up With Nothing Underneath? The Other End Is Held Down
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
A beam supported at one end only carries load by transferring it back into whatever holds that end rigid. Understanding where the forces go explains balconies, wings, diving boards and cranes.
Where the forces go
A beam resting on supports at both ends carries load by pushing down on those supports, and nothing more is needed. A beam held at one end only cannot do that, so the fixed end must resist both a downward push and a turning effect that tries to rotate the beam about the support, and that turning effect grows with the distance from the support to the load. Resisting rotation requires the support to grip the beam rigidly rather than merely hold it up, which means either an anchorage that is heavy enough not to lift or a continuation of the beam into a span on the other side.
What the arrangement buys
The reasons for accepting the additional difficulty are specific:
- •No support underneath, so the space below stays clear
- •Construction can proceed outward from a pier with no scaffolding beneath
- •Bridges can be built over water or gorges where falsework is impossible
- •Both halves can be built out simultaneously and joined in the middle
- •The structure supports itself at every stage of construction
- •Deflection at the free end is the price, and it is considerable
Why the top is in tension
A useful test of whether somebody has understood the arrangement is asking which face of the beam is being stretched. In an ordinary supported beam the load sags it downward, so the bottom is stretched and the top is squeezed, which is why reinforcement in a concrete beam sits near the bottom. In this arrangement the beam bends the other way, so the top face is stretched and the bottom is squeezed, and the reinforcement must sit near the top. Getting that wrong is a classic and catastrophic error, and several collapses have been traced to reinforcement placed as though the slab were supported at both ends.
The bridge form
Applying the principle to a bridge produces a distinctive arrangement that is worth recognising. Two towers each carry arms extending in both directions, with the landward arms anchored down and the seaward arms reaching towards each other, and a comparatively light suspended span is lifted into the gap between the two tips at the end. Building outward from each tower in balanced steps means no support is needed from below at any stage, which is what made deep water and deep gorges crossable. The Forth Bridge completed in 1890 and the Quebec Bridge are the famous examples, and the Quebec one collapsed twice during construction, in 1907 and 1916, with heavy loss of life.
Where it appears
The principle shows up far beyond buildings once recognised. An aircraft wing is a beam fixed at the fuselage and loaded along its length, which is why wings flex visibly upward in flight and why the structure is deepest at the root. A tower crane balances a loaded arm against a shorter counterweighted one over a central mast, which is the arrangement in its purest form. A diving board is a deliberately flexible version, designed so the deflection stores energy. Tree branches solve the same problem biologically, thickening where they meet the trunk. And the great steel bridges of the late nineteenth century used it to cross spans nothing else could reach.
The takeaway
Holding a beam at one end only means the support must resist a turning effect that grows with distance to the load, so it must grip rigidly or be balanced by a span on the other side. The reward is clear space below and construction outward with no scaffolding beneath. The top face is stretched rather than the bottom, so reinforcement belongs near the top, and getting that backwards has caused collapses.