What Is a Coprolite? Fossil Droppings Full of Undigested Evidence
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Fossilised droppings are not a curiosity at the edge of palaeontology. They contain the remains of what an animal actually ate, which no skeleton can supply, and they preserve plants, bones, scales and parasites in a concentrated form that ordinary sediment rarely does.
How they survive at all
Faeces are organic and normally decompose within weeks, so preservation requires unusual conditions: rapid burial, low oxygen, and the presence of minerals that can replace the material before it breaks down. Calcium phosphate is the common mineral involved, and carnivore droppings preserve far more readily than herbivore ones because a diet high in bone supplies the phosphate directly, which is why the fossil record is substantially biased towards predators. The mineralisation happens quickly, sometimes within days, which is what allows fine structures inside to be preserved, including muscle tissue, undigested plant cells and parasite eggs. Identifying a specimen as genuine requires care, since many rounded nodules look similar, and the evidence sought includes internal contents of biological origin, phosphate content, characteristic spiral or coiled shapes produced by the gut, and inclusions arranged the way material passes through an intestine rather than settling. Mistakes in both directions are common enough that published identifications are frequently challenged.
What has been found inside
The contents supply information available from no other source:
- •Bone fragments identifying prey species, including a large specimen attributed to a tyrannosaur containing crushed bone from a juvenile herbivore
- •Plant material including wood, leaves, cuticle and pollen, which reveals herbivore diets and the vegetation available at a site
- •Grass phytoliths, microscopic silica bodies from grasses, found in Indian dinosaur coprolites and pushing back the known origin of grasses considerably
- •Parasite eggs and protozoa, which document disease and the deep history of host-parasite relationships
- •Insect remains, fish scales, crustacean fragments and shell, each identifying a component of the diet
- •Burrows and feeding traces made by dung beetles and other organisms within the dropping itself, which show that decomposer communities were operating as they do now
The difficulty of attribution
Matching a specimen to the animal that produced it is rarely possible and is the central limitation of the field. The producer is not present, several animals in the same environment may produce similar material, and the shape of a dropping depends on gut anatomy in ways that are not well understood for extinct animals. Attribution therefore relies on indirect reasoning: the size of the specimen sets a lower bound on the producer, the contents indicate a carnivore or herbivore, the associated fauna limits the candidates, and occasionally a specimen is found in direct association with a skeleton. Confident attributions in the literature are correspondingly rare and cautious, and headline claims naming a species are usually softer in the original paper than in the coverage. As with footprints and burrows, the material is classified within the study of trace fossils and given its own descriptive names, which allows specimens to be catalogued and compared without pretending to know who made them.
Where they turn up
Certain settings produce them in quantity and the reasons are instructive. Shallow marine deposits yield large numbers from fish and marine reptiles, because a dropping entering water sinks into soft sediment and is buried quickly, which is why some of the richest material comes from marine rocks rather than from land. Lake beds and floodplain deposits preserve terrestrial examples where flooding buried them rapidly. Caves are exceptional, since dry sheltered conditions can preserve unmineralised material for tens of thousands of years, and desiccated rather than fossilised droppings from ground sloths, hyenas and humans have supplied detailed dietary and environmental records from the last ice age. Archaeological sites yield human material preserved in latrines, bogs and dry caves, which has produced direct evidence of diet, parasite load and plant use in past populations, and which is a substantial field in its own right. The commercial trade in polished specimens is considerable, and much of what is sold is either a different kind of nodule entirely or genuine material stripped of the location data that would have made it scientifically useful.
The wider trace fossil picture
Coprolites belong to a category of evidence that records behaviour rather than anatomy, and the field has grown considerably because that is exactly what body fossils cannot supply. Gut contents preserved inside a skeleton, called cololites, are a related and more directly attributable source. Regurgitated pellets, comparable to those produced by modern owls, have been identified and carry similar dietary information. Bite marks on bone identify predators and scavengers and occasionally match specific tooth spacing. Burrows reveal that several groups dug and sheltered underground. Nests, tracks and feeding traces complete the picture. The founding figure of the study of fossil droppings was the nineteenth-century geologist William Buckland, an eccentric and serious scientist who coined the term, recognised what the specimens were and reconstructed ancient food webs from them, and who is remembered partly for that work and partly for his stated ambition to eat his way through the animal kingdom.
The takeaway
Droppings mineralise only under rapid burial and low oxygen, and bone-rich carnivore output supplies its own phosphate, which biases the record heavily towards predators. Contents have yielded prey species, plant cuticle, parasite eggs and grass phytoliths that moved back the known origin of grasses. Matching a specimen to its producer is rarely possible, so they are named descriptively as trace fossils.