What Is a Dinosaur Egg? Nests That Rewrote How These Animals Lived
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Fossil eggs were not recognised for what they were until the 1920s, and once nests began to be excavated properly they changed the picture of dinosaurs from solitary reptiles to animals that built structures, returned to sites and in some cases sat on their clutches.
What an eggshell records
Eggshell is mineral, mostly calcium carbonate, and it fossilises well, so shell fragments are far more common in the record than whole eggs and are found at many sites where no bones survive. Under a microscope the shell shows a structure of crystal units and pore canals whose arrangement differs between major groups, which allows fossil shell to be classified even when nobody knows which animal laid it, using a parallel naming system in the same way that footprints are named separately. Pore density is informative, because gas exchange requirements differ between eggs buried in sediment and vegetation, which need many pores to breathe through damp covering, and eggs incubated in open nests, which need fewer. Thickness relates to the weight the shell must bear and to the size of the animal inside. Isotopic and structural analysis has extended this further, and work on preserved pigment traces has recovered the colours of some eggs, showing that blue-green and speckled eggs existed among the dinosaurs that led to birds.
What the nests showed
Excavating whole nesting sites rather than isolated eggs produced most of the significant findings:
- •Colonial nesting, with many nests spaced roughly a body length apart at sites in Montana and elsewhere, indicating that animals nested together and returned to the same ground
- •Parental care, inferred from nests containing juveniles that had remained after hatching and whose limb joints suggested they could not yet walk well
- •Brooding posture, established when a specimen was found sitting directly on top of its own clutch with its limbs folded around it, in the posture of a bird
- •Arrangement of eggs in rings, spirals and paired rows, which reflects how the animal moved as it laid rather than being random
- •Embryos preserved inside eggs, which is the only way to match an egg type to a species with confidence and has been achieved for a small number of kinds
- •Evidence of nest covering with vegetation or sediment in some groups and open incubation in others, inferred from pore density and from the sediments surrounding the clutch
The misidentification that stood for seventy years
An expedition to Mongolia in the 1920s found the first widely recognised dinosaur eggs, and alongside one clutch lay a small theropod which was accordingly named as the egg thief, on the assumption that it had died raiding the nest of a horned dinosaur whose remains were common in the area. That interpretation stood for decades and entered every popular account. In the 1990s an embryo was found inside one of the same egg type and turned out to belong to the supposed thief, which meant the animal had been sitting on its own nest and had been named for a crime it did not commit. The name cannot be changed under the rules of zoological nomenclature, which require priority regardless of whether the original reasoning was wrong. The episode is now a standard teaching example of how an initial interpretation can persist through repetition, and of why evidence about behaviour requires more than proximity of two things in the same rock.
Eggs, size and the limits they impose
Egg size did not scale with adult size in the way people expect, and the largest known dinosaur eggs are far smaller relative to the animal than a bird's egg is. The constraint is physical: shell must be thick enough to support the contents and thin enough for the hatchling to break out and for gas to diffuse through, and those requirements conflict as size increases, which sets an upper limit on egg volume regardless of how large the parent grows. The consequence is that the largest sauropods hatched from eggs a few kilograms in weight and had to grow through several orders of magnitude, passing through size ranges occupied by entirely different ecological roles as they did so, which has substantial implications for how communities were structured. It also means very large dinosaurs could not have brooded their clutches by sitting on them without crushing them, and the evidence indicates they buried them instead, with brooding restricted to smaller animals closer to the origin of birds.
The takeaway
Shell is mineral and fossilises readily, with pore density revealing whether a clutch was buried or incubated in the open, and preserved pigment has recovered blue-green and speckled colours. Excavating whole sites showed colonial nesting, returning to the same ground, and one animal preserved sitting on its own clutch. The specimen named as an egg thief turned out to be the parent. Shell thickness limits egg size, so the largest dinosaurs hatched small.