Why Do These Roman-Era Faces Look So Modern? Panels From Egyptian Coffins
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Painted panels bound into mummy wrappings in Roman Egypt show individual faces with a directness that looks almost photographic. They are the largest surviving body of ancient panel painting and they sit between two traditions.
What they are
The portraits are painted panels, usually of limewood and occasionally on linen, placed over the face of a mummified body and held by the wrappings, produced in Egypt during the Roman period from roughly the first to the third century. They depict a single individual facing the viewer, generally from the shoulders up, with careful attention to features, hairstyle, jewellery and clothing. Most were painted in encaustic, meaning pigment mixed with heated beeswax and applied while molten, which gives a thick worked surface and colours that have survived remarkably, and a minority were painted in tempera. Around a thousand survive, many from a particular region, and they constitute by a wide margin the largest surviving group of painted portraits from antiquity.
What makes them unusual
Several features distinguish them from other ancient images:
- •They depict identifiable individuals rather than idealised types
- •They use modelling in light and shade rather than outline and flat colour
- •The eyes are directed at the viewer, which Egyptian funerary art generally avoided
- •Hairstyles and jewellery follow Roman fashion closely enough to date a panel within a few decades
- •Many show signs of being painted from life rather than after death
- •The surface quality of encaustic resembles later oil painting more than anything else from the period
Two traditions meeting
The objects sit exactly at a cultural junction and each element comes from a different side. Mummification, the funerary context and the belief system that required a preserved likeness are Egyptian and very old. The style of depiction, the attention to individual features, the modelling and the conventions of dress and hair are Roman, reflecting a population that included Greeks settled since the Ptolemaic period, Romans and Egyptians who had adopted elements of both. The names recorded on some panels and in associated documents are correspondingly mixed. The result is a genuinely hybrid object, which is why it looks unfamiliar from either direction, and it is among the clearest material evidence for what cultural mixing actually produced in a specific place and period.
What the encaustic technique involves
The medium deserves description because it explains how the surfaces look and why so little else survives in it. Pigment is mixed into beeswax, which is kept molten and applied hot, setting almost immediately, so the painter works quickly and builds the image in strokes that remain visible as ridges and pools rather than blending smoothly. Tools included brushes and a heated metal spatula for pushing and shaping the wax. The resulting surface is thick and slightly translucent, which gives the flesh a depth that flat media do not achieve. Wax is chemically stable and does not yellow or crack as oil does, which is why the colours look fresh after eighteen centuries. The technique was described in classical sources, largely disappeared, and has been revived by modern painters interested in exactly those properties.
What happened to them
The history of their recovery is unfortunate and matters for what can be learned from them. Large numbers were removed from cemeteries in the late nineteenth century by excavators working commercially, panels were detached from the bodies they belonged to and sold separately, and the associated information about age, name, burial and context was frequently lost entirely. That separation means most surviving portraits cannot be connected to the individual they depict, and the few excavated properly with body and panel together are correspondingly valuable, since comparing the painted face with the physical remains tests whether the images are accurate and by several such comparisons they largely are. Modern analytical work has identified pigments, wood species and workshop practices, which is reconstructing some of what the excavation destroyed.
The takeaway
Painted panels bound into mummy wrappings in Roman Egypt show individuals with modelling, direct gaze and datable Roman fashion, mostly in pigment mixed with hot beeswax. They combine an Egyptian funerary requirement with a Roman manner of depiction. Nineteenth century commercial excavation separated most panels from the bodies they belonged to and lost the associated information.