What Is a Nautiloid? The Group That Kept Surviving
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Shelled cephalopods appeared before almost anything else recognisable, dominated early seas with straight shells several metres long, and have survived every mass extinction since while their coiled relatives the ammonites did not. A handful of species remain.
Straight shells first
The earliest nautiloids appear in the late Cambrian and radiate through the Ordovician into a wide range of forms, and the most striking of them carried straight conical shells rather than coiled ones. Orthoceratids of that kind reached several metres in length and were among the largest animals of their time, active predators in seas where nothing else of comparable size existed. The shell was chambered in the same way that later coiled forms and ammonites were, with the animal in the outer chamber and a tube running back through the sealed ones allowing fluid to be moved for buoyancy control, and the straight form required the animal to balance a long shell horizontally, which it managed by depositing dense material in the rear chambers as ballast. Curved and loosely coiled forms appear alongside them, and tight coiling, which is the arrangement that survives today, developed later and proved more manoeuvrable, which is one explanation for why it persisted.
What distinguishes them from ammonites
The two groups are frequently confused and differ in ways that are visible in the fossils:
- •Suture lines, meaning the junction between each internal wall and the shell, which are simple curves in nautiloids and progressively elaborate folded patterns in ammonites
- •The position of the internal tube, which runs centrally in most nautiloids and along the outer edge in ammonites
- •Tentacle count, with the living nautilus having dozens of simple tentacles without suckers, unlike the eight or ten of other living cephalopods
- •Eyes, since the nautilus has a pinhole eye with no lens, filled with seawater, which is a genuinely primitive arrangement
- •Reproductive strategy, with nautiloids laying a small number of large eggs producing well-developed young, against the very small planktonic young of ammonites
- •Survival, since nautiloids passed through the end-Permian and end-Cretaceous extinctions while ammonites did not survive the second
Why they survived
The contrast with ammonites is the most instructive thing about the group. Both were shelled cephalopods occupying broadly similar roles, and the asteroid impact at the end of the Cretaceous eliminated one entirely while the other continued. The favoured explanation concerns early life history. Ammonites hatched tiny and lived as plankton, feeding within a plankton community that collapsed catastrophically after the impact as photosynthesis was interrupted. Nautiloids lay few large eggs that develop slowly and hatch as miniature adults living on or near the sea floor, feeding on detritus and carrion rather than on plankton, which is a food supply that persists when primary production fails. Slow growth, long life and low metabolic demands fit the same account. That explains survival without implying superiority, since the strategy that saved them at the extinction is also the one that limits their diversity and abundance now, and a group producing few slow-growing young recovers from any population loss very slowly.
The living ones
Only a few species survive, in the Indo-Pacific, living on deep reef slopes and migrating vertically at night to feed in shallower water. They are scavengers and opportunistic feeders with poor vision and a highly developed sense of smell, locating food by chemical trails. Their buoyancy control is the same system the fossils show. They grow slowly, mature after years and produce few eggs, which makes them vulnerable to any sustained harvesting. That vulnerability has become a live conservation matter, since the shells are collected and sold as ornaments and the trade has been substantial enough to deplete local populations, leading to international trade restrictions being adopted in 2016 requiring permits for export. Research access is limited and basic questions about their biology, including population sizes and lifespan, remain poorly answered. They are also studied as a model for buoyancy, for pinhole optics and for cephalopod evolution, since they are the only living animals retaining an external chambered shell.
The takeaway
The earliest forms carried straight shells several metres long and balanced them with dense ballast in the rear chambers. Simple suture lines and a central internal tube distinguish them from ammonites. Laying few large eggs that hatch as bottom-feeding miniature adults appears to explain why they survived the end-Cretaceous impact when plankton-feeding ammonite young did not, and that same strategy keeps them scarce today.