← All articles
psychologymemorytechniquelearningSeptember 17, 20264 min read

How Do People Memorise Long Numbers? Turning Digits Into Words

By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.

Digits are hard to remember because they carry no meaning and sound alike. A centuries-old technique assigns a consonant sound to each digit, converts numbers into words, and makes them memorable by making them mean something.

Why numbers are hard

Memory works far better on meaningful, distinctive and imageable material than on abstract symbols, and digits fail on all three counts. There are only ten of them, they repeat constantly, they have no inherent meaning, and they are difficult to picture, so a string of them offers nothing for memory to grip. The standard finding is that people hold around seven items in immediate memory, which puts a hard limit on raw digit spans, and that limit is not raised by effort. What does raise it is chunking, meaning grouping items into larger meaningful units, since the limit applies to chunks rather than to elements. Every technique for remembering numbers is a way of manufacturing meaningful chunks from meaningless ones.

How the system works

The method maps digits to consonant sounds and lets vowels fill in freely:

  • Each digit from zero to nine is assigned one or more consonant sounds, chosen for distinctness
  • Vowels and a few consonants carry no value and can be inserted anywhere
  • A number is converted into a sequence of consonant sounds and vowels are added to make a word
  • The word is then pictured, which gives the number an image
  • Longer numbers become several words, linked into a scene or placed along a remembered route
  • The mapping is by sound rather than by spelling, which matters for silent letters and doubled ones

Where it came from

The technique has a documented history stretching back several centuries. Systems assigning letters to digits appear in the seventeenth century, with successive writers refining the assignment to make the sounds more distinguishable, and the version in use today largely settled in the nineteenth century when it was popularised through commercial memory training. Memory instruction was a substantial business in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, sold by correspondence course alongside claims that were frequently extravagant. The method is now used mainly by competitors in memory sports, where it is combined with the much older technique of placing images along a familiar route, and where the resulting feats include memorising the order of shuffled card decks and very long digit sequences in minutes.

The older technique it rests on

The digit system is usually combined with a much older method, and the combination is what makes long sequences possible. The method of places involves mentally walking a familiar route, a house or a building and depositing an image at each location along it, then retrieving them by walking the route again, and it works because spatial memory is unusually robust and because a route imposes order automatically. It is described in Roman rhetorical texts as standard training for orators delivering long speeches without notes, and it persisted through medieval and Renaissance memory treatises as a serious intellectual technique rather than a curiosity. Modern imaging work finds that people using it engage spatial navigation regions of the brain, which is consistent with the technique borrowing machinery evolved for finding one's way and applying it to arbitrary material.

Whether it is worth learning

The honest assessment separates what the technique does from what it is sold as. It demonstrably works for its intended purpose, since trained users reliably do things untrained ones cannot, and the underlying principles are well supported, particularly that meaningful imageable material is retained far better than abstract material. What it does not do is improve memory generally, since studies of memory athletes find ordinary performance outside their trained domain and no structural difference from other people, with the skill residing in the strategy rather than in the apparatus. The setup cost is substantial, requiring the mapping to become automatic before the method is faster than rehearsal. And for most practical purposes, writing the number down is better, which is why the technique thrives as a sport rather than as a life skill.

The takeaway

Digits resist memory because they are few, repetitive, meaningless and hard to picture, and the limit on immediate memory applies to chunks rather than elements. Mapping each digit to a consonant sound lets numbers become words and then images. Memory athletes show ordinary performance outside their trained domain, so the skill is the strategy rather than an improved memory.

Practise this

Questions from Memory

Reading about something is not the same as being able to recall it. These are real questions from the Memory unit in our Psychology track, answers and explanations included. The unit has 120 in total across 23 steps.

  • Match the pairsLevel 3

    1. Match each false-memory term to its meaning.

    Answer: Misinformation effect = Later false info changes a memory; Leading question = Wording that hints at an answer; Source error = Forgetting where a memory came from

    Each of these shows a different way real memories can be reshaped or misattributed.

  • Choose all that applyLevel 2

    2. Which of these are the three main processes of memory? (Pick three)

    • Encodingcorrect
    • Storagecorrect
    • Retrievalcorrect
    • Dreaming
    • Guessing

    Encoding, storage, and retrieval are the three main memory processes.

  • Multiple choiceLevel 1

    3. Which memory holds only a little information for a short time?

    • Short-term memorycorrect
    • Long-term memory
    • A memory that lasts for years
    • Permanent memory

    Short-term memory keeps a small amount of information for only a short while.