Why Does the Dial Read Differently From Over There? You Are Looking Across It
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
Reading a scale from an angle rather than straight on gives the wrong answer, because the pointer and the scale sit at different distances from the eye. Instruments are designed specifically to prevent it.
Why an angle changes the reading
A pointer sits a small distance in front of the scale it indicates, because it must be free to move without rubbing. Viewed straight on, the pointer lines up with the correct mark. Viewed from one side, the line of sight passes through the pointer and continues to strike the scale at a different mark, and the size of that displacement depends on the gap between the two and on how far off-axis the eye is. The same effect makes a car speedometer read differently to driver and passenger, and it is the reason a thumb held up appears to jump when the eye viewing it is switched.
Where it shows up
The error appears wherever a scale is read by eye:
- •Analogue dials, gauges and instrument faces of every kind
- •Rulers, where the markings sit on top of a thickness of material
- •Measuring cylinders and jugs, read against a curved liquid surface
- •Mercury and spirit thermometers with the scale beside the tube
- •Vehicle instruments, read by somebody not sitting in front of them
- •Sights on tools and weapons, where the two marks sit far apart
How instruments prevent it
Designers attack the problem in ways that are visible once known. A strip of mirror set into the scale is the classic solution, since the reader moves until the pointer hides its own reflection, which can only happen when the eye is exactly perpendicular. Knife-edge pointers reduce the ambiguity by presenting a thin edge rather than a wide bar. Placing markings directly on the surface being measured removes the gap entirely, which is why a good ruler has its scale on a bevelled edge that meets the work. Digital displays eliminate the problem rather than solving it. And instruments are frequently marked with the angle from which they are calibrated to be read.
The version in a liquid
Reading a liquid level adds a second difficulty on top of the viewing angle, and school laboratories drill both together. Liquid in a narrow tube curves at its surface, rising at the edges where it wets the glass or dipping there where it does not, so there is no single level to read and a convention is required, which is to read the bottom of the curve for water and most liquids and the top for mercury. That reading must also be taken with the eye level with the surface, since looking down at it from above or up from below shifts the apparent position against the scale exactly as with a pointer. Both errors are systematic, so they bias a result rather than scattering it.
The useful version of the same effect
The displacement that ruins a reading is also a measuring tool in its own right, since the size of the shift reveals distance. Surveying instruments measure the apparent shift of a distant object against a background from two known positions and compute the distance by triangle geometry. Rangefinders in cameras and in artillery use two apertures a fixed distance apart and measure the angle between the two views. Astronomers measure the shift of a nearby star against distant ones as the Earth moves along its orbit, which gives the first rung of the distance ladder to the stars. And human depth perception at close range works on exactly the same principle, using two eyes a few centimetres apart.
The takeaway
A pointer sits in front of its scale so it can move freely, so a line of sight arriving at an angle strikes a different mark than one arriving perpendicular. Mirror strips let a reader hide the pointer's reflection and guarantee a square view, knife-edge pointers narrow the ambiguity, and markings on a bevelled edge remove the gap. The same displacement measures distance in surveying, rangefinders and stellar astronomy.