What Is an Own Goal? The Rule That Decides Who Gets the Blame
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
A goal credited against the player who last touched the ball rather than to the attacker sounds like a simple definition, and the criteria for awarding one are surprisingly contested, differ between competitions, and are decided after the match by people who were not on the pitch.
How the decision is made
The goal itself counts regardless, so the question is purely about attribution, and that attribution is generally not made by the referee. In major competitions a dedicated panel reviews contested goals and decides whether a deflection was sufficient to change the credit, using criteria that centre on whether the original shot was on target and would have entered the goal without the touch, and on how substantial the deflection was. A shot heading well wide that is deflected in is an own goal. A shot already on target that clips a defender is generally credited to the attacker. Between those lies a substantial grey area, and panels in different leagues reach different conclusions on similar incidents, which is why the same goal can be attributed differently by different statistical providers. That matters commercially, since goalscoring records affect contracts, bonuses, awards and fantasy football scoring, and there are documented cases of clubs formally appealing an attribution on a player's behalf.
The oddities in the rules
Several situations produce results that surprise people who assume the rule is simple:
- •A player cannot score an own goal directly from a free kick, a corner, a throw-in or a goal kick, and if the ball goes straight into their own net from one, the restart is a corner to the opposition instead
- •A goalkeeper who throws or kicks the ball into their own net is credited with an own goal in the ordinary way
- •A deflection off a defender following a shot that was going wide is an own goal, so the attacker gets nothing for creating the situation
- •Two own goals in the same match by the same player is a recognised and unwelcome statistical category
- •In some competitions the attacking player receives the goal whenever the shot was on target, which is a different standard from others and makes cross-league comparison unreliable
- •Own goals count towards a team's goals against, but they are not recorded against a goalkeeper for the purposes of save percentages
The strategic own goal
Competition formats occasionally make scoring against yourself rational, and the results have forced rule changes. The most notorious example is a 1994 Caribbean Cup qualifier in which a rule awarding two goals for any score in extra time meant one side needed to win by two, and after taking a one-goal lead they attempted to score in their own net to force extra time, while the other side attempted to prevent it and simultaneously to score in the same net, producing several minutes of both teams defending one goal and attacking the other. A match in Thailand in 1998 saw a team score deliberately to avoid a harder opponent in the next round, and both teams in a 2013 fixture attempted the same thing. Badminton at the 2012 Olympics produced comparable behaviour without own goals, with pairs attempting to lose, and eight players were disqualified. In each case the underlying fault is the tournament design rather than the participants, and organisers have generally responded by changing the format.
The human cost
Own goals attract a level of attention disproportionate to their frequency, and the consequences for individuals have occasionally been severe. The most serious case is that of the Colombian defender Andres Escobar, who scored an own goal at the 1994 World Cup and was shot dead in Medellin days after returning home, in a killing widely connected to betting interests. Less extreme but well documented are cases of abuse, threats and career damage following high-profile incidents, and the treatment of players who make visible errors has become a recognised concern in sports psychology and in governing bodies' work on online abuse. Broadcast and social media amplify a single moment far beyond the match, and clips circulate indefinitely. Against that, football culture has partially absorbed the phenomenon into humour, and compilation content is a staple, which sits uncomfortably alongside the documented harm and is a reasonable illustration of how the same event can be entertainment for a large audience and a serious matter for one person.
The takeaway
The goal counts regardless and only the credit is in question, decided after the match by panels applying criteria about whether the shot was on target and how large the deflection was, with different competitions reaching different answers on similar incidents. A ball entering your own net directly from a corner or free kick is not an own goal but a corner to the opposition. Tournament formats have occasionally made scoring against yourself rational.