Existentialism and the Search for Meaning
By the BrainSnail editorial team. How these articles are written and checked, and how to tell us when one is wrong.
People often ask what gives life meaning, as though the answer might be hidden somewhere waiting to be found. Existentialist thinkers approach the question differently. They ask how you should live when no single plan can make your choices for you.
Existence comes before a fixed identity
Jean-Paul Sartre argued that human beings first exist and then define themselves through action. A manufactured tool is designed for a purpose before it is made, but a person is not born with one complete role that settles every important decision.
This does not mean biology, history or society have no influence. Your choices occur within conditions you did not choose, including your body, family, language and time. Existential freedom means responding within those conditions rather than floating beyond every limit.
Because choices help shape character, identity is not only something you discover. It is also something you build. Repeated actions can make values visible more clearly than claims about the kind of person you hope to be.
Freedom brings responsibility and anxiety
Freedom can feel hopeful because it leaves room for change. It can also feel uncomfortable because there may be no perfect authority able to guarantee that your decision is correct. Existentialists often describe anxiety as part of recognising genuine possibility and responsibility.
Sartre used the idea of bad faith for ways people hide from freedom. Someone may pretend that a social role completely determines their behaviour or claim that they had no choice when alternatives, however difficult, remained.
This idea should not be used to ignore coercion or unequal circumstances. Real options can be severely restricted. The useful question is not whether everyone can do anything, but where responsibility remains inside the situation that actually exists.
Meaning grows through commitment
Albert Camus explored the absurd, the tension between the human desire for clear meaning and a world that may not provide a final answer. His response was not simple despair. He emphasised living fully and honestly without inventing false certainty.
Existential meaning can grow through relationships, work, creativity, care and chosen principles. A commitment matters because you continue to support it through action, not because the universe has printed it on an official form.
Questions to consider include:
- •Which values appear in my actual choices?
- •Which limits are real and which are excuses?
- •What responsibilities follow from my freedom?
- •Which commitments make my life more honest?
- •How do my choices affect other people?
Simone de Beauvoir and the ethics of other people
Existentialism is often presented as a philosophy of the lone individual, and its most careful ethical work argues the opposite. Simone de Beauvoir, in The Ethics of Ambiguity and The Second Sex, took Sartre's idea of freedom and asked what it means when other people's freedom is at stake. Her answer was that my freedom is only real if I will the freedom of others too, because a choice that depends on keeping someone else unfree is a kind of bad faith.
She also showed how a whole group can be pushed into the position of the Other, defined by what it is not and denied the open future that existentialism assumes; that analysis of women's situation became a foundation of modern feminism. The older existentialists point the same way. Kierkegaard's leap of faith and Nietzsche's call to create values are both addressed to a person who has to live among others, and the questions in the list above are worth asking about your effect on them as much as on yourself.
The takeaway
Existentialism treats meaning as something shaped through freedom, responsibility and commitment rather than received as a finished answer. You do not control every condition of your life, but your responses still matter. The philosophy asks you to choose carefully, act honestly and accept that uncertainty does not make meaningful action impossible.